Great Theatre Should Be
Everyone’s “Inheritance”
By TONY VELLELA
Matthew Lopez, whose new blockbuster play “The Inheritance” is currently running at the Barrymore, has been quoted as saying that “Reporting is a terrible word in drama – reported action is the most uninteresting thing. But characters can also report on what they’re feeling, and in ways that they wouldn’t share with another character.” Reporters are taught at the very start of their journalistic careers that they must honor the five W’s :’ Who, What, When, Where and Why. Critics are meant to fold together the first four in service to their obligation to satisfy an audience’s desire to take away the fifth W, the Why component, to be satisfied at the point that the play concludes. In the case of “The Inheritance,” there is an abundance [some say an overabundance] of What’s. This complicates [some would say overcomplicates] to no end the need to satisfy the audience’s desire to come away with the Why’s.
For a start, Lopez has encouraged the notion that his piece is a comedy. Were there no take-aways of humor, the play would feel like a dry twig awaiting someone to snap it in half. Thankfully, Lopez understands the need for humor, and he possesses the skill to introduce those moments organically in such a way so as not to damage the storylines the play relates.
“The Inheritance” whirls around the core event in the story, which is watching Toby Darling, a young writer, turn his successful novel into a play. The people we are introduced to are both friends of the author, and consequentially, ‘characters’ in a play that one of the actors in that play decides to pen. Ten gay men in contemporary New York City meet on Sundays for brunch, and what they share, apart from their wish to engage in a group-sharing meal, is the fact that they are all gay, and have a commitment to social justice. What they do during the day hours– teach, administer, perform surgery, etc. – does not give them a shared purpose, but they do it because it is what they are best at, in the take-home-pay world. Sometimes how they got to that decision is related explicitly, sometimes it is merely pointed out. Their list of ‘careers’ is not meant to bind them together. What they share is their sexuality. How they choose to express it, is in itself as varied as the careers themselves.
It’s interesting to note that Lopez played the young boy Michael Darling in a school production of ‘Peter Pan.,’ giving Lopez the last name of his key character. When young Toby’s book, “Loved Boy,” is tapped to become a play, it awakens, in the writer’s mind, “Howard’s End,” the iconic masterwork written in 1910 by E.M. Forster. Forster also wrote “Maurice,” about two men in a sexual relationship, and decreed that it not be released until after his death, which did not happen until 1970. His ‘Howard’s End’ presents the disparate decisions and consequences that occur in the lives of two sisters in turn-of-the-twentieth-century London, pitting people from opposite ends of the spectrum, in terms of class, status, gender, self-identity and ambition. Toby, in Lopez’s work, upends that premise to include the impact of sexuality. This is not to inject justification for equal rights for gay people into the mix. That is assumed. What is not assumed is the outcomes from making life choices, in terms of circumstance, that result in Toby coming to terms with the ‘lives’ of his characters.
Lopez decides that his central character, Toby, must attain the permission to proceed with this venture only after obtaining the ‘permission’ of Forster, or at least receive some sign that he has the right to do so. To that end, he inserts a character named Morgan, a surrogate for Forster, to provide that assurance. Morgan takes in what the young writer is seeking, listening as the assembled members of the Sunday brunch gatherings give Toby their individual and collective points of view on what the story is or should be. Once they have exhausted their considered opinions, Morgan [the Forster stand-in] grants Toby the permission he so desperately needs, to continue unabated in his crafting of the play he desperately seeks to complete. Morgan appears from time to time, to provide Toby with a compass meant to give him the guidance needed to finish the job.
And Who are these characters? At the center of the ever-expanding circle of men is Toby, a twenty-something writer who has managed to get his personally-inspired novel commissioned into becoming a play. It has taken him many months to produce the first draft of a playscript. And his most prominent supporter is Walter, an older gay man whom he met at the Hamptons party, and who wishes to enable Toby to feel comfortable in the role of playwright and leave his conventional job behind a desk behind. Toby gets support from his boyfriend Eric, who has the same objective for Toby, for him to settle into a life as a writer. When Toby’s play gets a pre-Broadway try-out in Chicago, Adam, an actor in the cast, begins to write his own play. In it, Adam appropriates the names and partial identities of the gather-for-brunch bunch, including some of their names. And Toby’s brunch bunch are incorporated into Adam’s undertaking. Each member of the cast chimes in from moment to moment, with Toby accepting or rejecting their proposed additions or corrections. The result is what Toby crafts into his play.
While Toby is slaving away at his computer, pounding out scene after scene, his boyfriend Eric befriends Walter, an older man whom he met at that Hamptons party who has since moved into Eric’s building. [Walter finds it highly amusing that Toby, while attending that party, gets engulfed in an incident involving a dog, many martinis and the projectile vomiting that spews forth onto Meryl Streep’s lap.] Walter sees in Eric the potential for Eric to share a sense of purpose in crafting a family together with another man. Eric does not see himself in that role. He welcomes the attention, and enjoys those gathered in an expanded number of interests and conversational topics. As time goes on, Eric finds himself spending more and more time with Walter, who does not put a limit on the amount of time they spend together. Meanwhile, Eric finally pops the question to Toby, asking him to get married. The question grips Toby, who resists the offer, but does not wish to end the relationship. After Walter tells Eric about the house that he and his former partner bought at the height of the epidemic, he accepts Walter’s invitation to visit the house, where Henry is living. When it comes time to leave the house, which Eric falls in love with on sight, Eric stays the night. And when that overnight blossoms into many nights when Eric gets to know Henry as well, Eric resists the notion of wedding, but manages to keep the relationships alive, and thriving. Later, going against Henry’s wishes, Eric begins to invite friends sick with AIDS, and even strangers similarly afflicted, to the house, where they could live out their life with a caring person who decides to tend to their needs during their final days.
As Adam’s play takes shape, it incorporates much the same issues in the life of Adam’s characters as the brunch bunch ‘cast.’ Walter uses this as a way to negate his own feelings of weakness. Later, the needs of the house are shared with Margaret, a formerly homophobic late eighties-something woman, the mother of one of Walter’s hospice patients. She is the only woman to appear in the play, and as delivered by the incomparable Lois Smith, in an extended monologue that can feel like a protracted speech lifted from an unashamedly guileless novel, offers the audience a display of flagellation yearned for during the previous intake of scenes and moments.
As the deathbed visits become more numerous, they provide more closure to so many more. It is a plea to audience members to generate more consideration. Margaret’s desperate monologue comes as balance to the opening pronouncements from Morgan [Forster], a greatly-earned closure that gives us the welcomed opportunity to assess what has come before, and to make our own judgments as to what the previous seven hours have delivered, however tortured they may have seemed.
With so many brunch bunch participants vying to contribute to Toby’s play, and so many ‘characters’ in Adam’s play emerging as that work takes place, the number of Who’s keeps growing. It is almost impossible to keep track of all the named people, since many share the same name with someone else in either the play or the brunch bunch. It’s nearly impossible to keep the Who’s straight [pardon that one].
And in straining to elaborate on the various Who’s, one gets a qualified sense of the What’s. Lopez’s play reflects many aspects of his personal life, as it struggles to mirror the playwright’s real encounters as it spills onto the pages of “Loved Boy,” the play. That play stars a talented young actor named Adam, who bears a striking resemblance to the down-on-his-luck sex worker named Leo that Toby meets outside the Strand bookstore where a mix-up of look-alike notebooks puts Leo the sex worker in touch with Toby, the writer. A passing of his business card from Toby to Leo gives Leo someone to call on Christmas Eve, when Leo aches to find someone to talk to. He tracks down Toby, who mistakenly thinks Leo is looking for a new client. But all Leo is looking for is a place to shower and do his laundry. They eventually wind up sharing a bed, and sharing a night. And since Leo bears such a strong resemblance to Adam, an actor in Toby’s play, the attraction grows into something much stronger than a chance encounter and a one-night stand for pay.
This ever-exploding number of men in both plays and lives pretty much torpedoes any hope of keeping all the Who’s from getting clear. And in trying to sort through all the Who’s, we find ourselves witnessing or hearing about so many more What’s. Plays are being written, sex is being tried and tried [and tried again and tried some more, employing a variety of incantations] and found either lacking interest or giving the participants real pleasure that wants to be repeated, passions get ignited, styles get traded and just as soon as they reach climax, they are either ripe for being repeated or sworn off for good, and in the end, the What’s are also sworn off as elements in either play. The What’s get exhausted. And the When’s are made clearer in the re-tellings. And the Where’s are either in someone’s apartment, in a rehearsal room, or in a convenient other site. Finally, along comes the unanswered question – Why?
Before attempting to provide any answer to that, it must be made clear that, while it may seem that the proceedings may involve too many people and too much occurrence, the great value of the play rests with the skill that Lopez possesses as a story-teller. The value of this writer is that of a dramatist, not as a novelist, per se. Audiences are taken up with how they are captivated by the moment-to-moment slathering of events, one after another, which keeps them totally engaged. They easily get caught up in how one thought or action leads, seemingly effortlessly, to the next one. While the practice of naming two characters with the same name can make the need to follow things a bit problematic, seeing it rather than reading it provides all the clarity one needs to stay with the many storylines. One needs to see the similarities and differences played out on the stage, with the look of the personalities providing all the separateness one needs to stay with all disparate story lines to enjoy how well Lopez has invented the overall story. Lopez is, as a result, a much much better dramatist than he would be with the same material presented to us in novel form. One needs to see it rather than put the pictures in one’s head through a reader’s imagination. And in this instance, Lopez is very well-served to have such a talented collection of actors to perform that task so masterfully.
Now – the Why’s. For a start, Eric has the belief that any relationship has the ability to either heal or burn. To fall in love is to make an appointment with heartbreak. One of the visitors is an up-and-coming young artist whose work captivates the men, but who has the dedicated habit of burning his paintings once they are completed. Walter offers to buy one of his paintings and never look at it. The fact that all involved are barefoot is never explained, but seems to indicate the easy familiarity they have with each other, wherever they are, whatever is happening. It lends an air of casualness to whatever is happening, where it is happening, and the Why of it is never explicitly laid out. The prevailing sentiment is that the future is not to be second-guessed, but that the major problem with trying to comprehend it lies with the fact that the future is written in invisible ink. Toby finds that he likes to be wanted, but hates to be needed; he finds it to be a trap, as is any form of formal commitment.
When Terrence McNally saw the play, he proclaimed that it is not a play about AIDS. He said it is a play about the human experience. Lopez found that embracing his sexuality entailed an inheritance of grief. But the mourning felt abstract. How, he felt, does one contemplate loss on that level? Walter tries to convey the scale of the tragedy by naming all his friends who have been affected by this tragedy, and how it touched the lives of people, by naming all his friends. It takes the form of a litany delivered by naming all his friends – who has died, who is deadly ill, who has returned to his mother’s house to die there, who has travelled to Paris to try to locate HPA-23, who has peripheral neuropathy and can’t be touched, who has turned himself into a hermit. Toby, though seeming to have an effortless confidence, has in fact strenuously constructed that identity.
Lopez insists that there are a lot of endings in his play. However, he points out, there are a lot of endings in life. Which is where this review ends.
AfterPlay
You’ve still got plenty of time to get yourself to the Met to catch an inspiring new production of “Porgy and Bess,” the Gershwin classic, featuring Angel Blue as Bess and Eric Owens as Porgy, which holds forth from now until Feb. 15, Frederick Ballentine takes on the challenging role of Sportin’ Life . . . underway now at the Public Theatre is their annual ‘Under the Radar’ Festival, with performances around town, and including an astronomical virtual-reality experience compliments of Laurie Anderson and Hsin-Chen Huang and a solo piece by Daniel J. Watts. Check it all out at publictheater.org . . . New Jersey’s All Musicals season continues starting January 30 through March 1 with “Unmasked: The Music of Andrew Lloyd Webber” written by Richard Curtis, directed by Laurence Connor and choreographed by JoAnn M. Hunter. Featured are selections from his “Jesus Christ Superstar,” “Evita,” “Cats,” Phantom of the Opera” and “Sunset Boulevard” . . . the Mayor’s Office of Media and Entertainment recently released its study of how the world of New York theatre stretches far beyond the theatre district, enumerating 748 off-Broadway and Off Off-Broadway venues, which account for more than 3,000 jobs, Sites such as the New York Theatre Workshop [“Hadestown”, and the Atlantic Theatre company’s “The Band’s Visit” stood out, while the Public Theater’s “Hamilton” and “Fairview” from Soho Rep were recipients of the Pulitzer Prize for Drama. Fully 97 operate at permanent locations. Most of the nonprofit theatre organizations are in Manhattan, with 30 percent in Midtown and another 15 percent near the East Village and the Lower East Side. Smaller theaters are especially dependent on philanthropy and government grants, while the larger ones generate most of their operating funds from ticket sales. . . from February 6 to March 1, with an official opening night on February 13, Michael Urie will present Drew Droege in “Happy Birthday Doug.” The comedy, directed by Tom DeTrinis, tracks Doug as he turns 41, visited by friends, nightmares, some exes and especially, a ghost. It follows his hit solo piece “Bright Colors and Bold Patterns” . . . The jazz musical version of ‘The Wizard of Oz,” has been extended through June 20. The play, presented on a varied schedule available on wizardofozjazzmusical.com, is a jazzy stage adaptation of the classic film musical, is presented by Harlem Repertory Theater [HRT] and the Yip Harburg Lyrics Foundation, and features a multi-racial cast. HRT is in the midst of a four-year project to present classic musicals with lyrics by E.Y. “Yip” Harburg, and draws from the MGM film musical, with book by L. Frank Baum, composer Harold Arlen and Harburg’s lyrics. The production is being presented at the Tato Laviera Theatre, 240 East 123 Street, near Second Avenue . . . Olivia Levine’s solo show “Unstuck” returns to The Tank for a limited engagement running from January 30 through February 23, with an opening night slated for January 30. Directed by Molly Rose Heller, it follows her journey with OCD from childhood to adulthood . . . Symphony Space, at 2537 Broadway, at west 95th street, offers you a great place to launch your New Year’s resolution to cut back your theatre bookshelf by donating books at their lobby space from Monday through Saturday from 9 AM to 6 PM, and from 1 PM to 6 PM on Sundays. Details are available at 212 – 864 – 1414, x 202 . . . and on Monday, January 20th, at 7 PM, the Space’s Leonard Nimoy Theatre, the Thalia, will be presenting Bernard Shaw’s “Major Barbara,” featuring Mark Waldrop and Karen Ziemba, directed by David Staller . . . two free musical events will be on view at Lincoln Center. On Thursday, January at 7:30, the Arium 360 degrees features the C4 Trio: From Venezuela to the World, which transforms the cuatro guitar into a versatile and contemporary instrument with an entirely new musical vocabulary, and on Thursday, January, another free events, this one at Vaya! 63,has Los Cunpleanos, a psychedelic take on Colombian Cumbia, Son Caribeno, Salsa Criolla and other rhythms, presented in collaboration with the NYU Music and Social Change Lab . . . beginning this month, and originally staged by International Theater Amsterdam [formerly Toneelgroep Amsterdam] in 2014 in that city, writer/director Simon Stone is working with actors Rose Byrne and Bobby Cannavale in the lead roles of his contemporary rewrite of the Euripides tragedy “Medea.” Presented at BAM’s Harvey Theatre, details are available at BAM.org, or 718-636-4129. . . progress update: the new Drama Bookshop is slated to open in March or April at its new location at 260 West 39th street, about a block from its former location. Watch this space as new developments happen . . . The George Street Playhouse premieres “Midwives” by Chris Bohjalian on January 21st, that follows the events and subsequent criminal trial of a midwife charged in connection to a snowed-in caesarian birth by a midwife. Set to run until 2/16, details are available at www.georgestreetplayhouse.org.
On Book
Talking of the brothers Gershwin, two volumes relate their lives in great detail. Joan Peyser’s comprehensive study of the life of George, “The Memory of All That: The Life of George Gershwin,” from Hal Leonard, provides great insight into the genius of the man whose life was cut short in 1937 at the age of 38 . . . the less celebrated but equally brilliant brother Ira’s masterful brilliance is chronicled in “Ira Gershwin: Selected Lyrics,” edited by Robert Kimball, from the American Poets Project, whose gifts are presented. Included are the verse of “Someone to Watch Over Me:” There’s a somebody I’m longing to see: I hope that he, Turns out to be, Someone who’ll watch over me,” or the tricky internal doubling back in the lyric for “Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off:” ‘So if you like pajamas, and I Like pa-jah-mas, I’ll wear pajamas and give up pa-jah-mas, For we know we Need each other, so we Better call the calling off off, Let’s call the whole thing off!’ . . . and in discussing the role of off-Broadway on the New York theatre scene, the story begins and ends with Lucille Lortel, whose career as a producer helped launch the career of dozens of playwrights, actors and directors. Her life story is captured in “Lucille Lortel – The Queen of Off-Broadway,” by Alexis Greene, from Limelight Editions, New York.
TONY VELLELA wrote and produced the PBS theatre series “Character Studies.” His play “Admissions” won the Best Play Award at the New York International Fringe Festival, and received three productions in New York, directed by Austin Pendleton, and is published by Playscripts. His play “Maisie and Grover Go to the Theatre” is published by ArtAge Press. His theatre and entertainment reporting has appeared in dozens of publications, from Rolling Stone and Parade to The Christian Science Monitor and Readers Digest. He has written three books, hundreds of magazine and newspaper articles, taught at several institutions including Columbia University’s Teachers College and HB Studio. His “Test of Time” won the Best Documentary CableAce Award for Lifetime Television. His new play “Labor Days” is in development at the Directors Company.
CARMEL CAR AND LIMOUSINE SERVICE, in business since 1978, has been selected as the official transportation company for Intermission Talk. Its wide variety of services, including special theatre packages, and reservations, are available at carmellimo.com, the Carmel App, or at 212 – 666 – 6666.
——————————————————————————————————-